Restrictive Covenants and the United States Supreme Court
nCorrigan v. Buckley, 271 U.S. 323 (1926)
n[T]he prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment ‘have reference to State action exclusively, and not to any action of private individuals.’ . . .  ‘It is State action of a particular character that is prohibited. Individual invasion of individual rights is not the subject-matter of the Amendment.’ . . .  It is obvious that none of these amendments prohibited private individuals from entering into contracts respecting the control and disposition of their own property. . . .