Perhaps at no time in the history
of our nation has law played such a
central role in the development, execution,
and assessment of national security policy as
it has in relation to the U.S. response to the
terrorists attacks of September 11, 2001. This
phenomenon has produced unprecedented
tension between the policy demands of
national leaders charged with protecting the
nation from the threat of terrorism and the
inherent obligation to ensure such policies
comply with the fundamental legal principles
of our free society. As lawyers intuitively
understand, it is at this intersection of policy
demands of the client and obligations imposed
by the law that ethical challenges are bred.
The legal and ethical challenges associated
with the War on Terror have spanned
a spectrum ranging from the prosecution
and defense of alleged terrorists, the
characterization of terrorism as war crimes,
the treatment of alleged terrorist operatives,
and the application of U.S. national power
in the international community. In order
to explore the ethical and legal challenges
generated by this wide array of issues, South
Texas College of Law is proud to present this
year’s ethics symposium, Law, Ethics, and
the War on Terror.
This year’s symposium will include a
truly distinguished list of participants
with an extraordinary collective range of
experience and expertise. Participants include
several current or retired General Officers
from three different military services, experts
and practitioners in the field of terrorism
prosecution and defense in the federal civilian
court system, the Chief Prosecutor for the
Military Commissions at Guantanamo Bay,
the senior U.S. Army expert and advisor to
the Army Judge Advocate General on all law
|
of war issues, a nationally renowned expert
in terrorism law who also served 19 years
as a military attorney in the Israeli Defense
Forces, and many other experts. We are also
pleased to have the Regimental Historian
for the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s
Corps who will provide a presentation on the
historical role of military lawyers in national
security trials. And we are particularly excited
to announce as our Keynote Speaker Major
General Charles Dunlap, the currently serving
Assistant Judge Advocate General of the
U.S. Air Force and a nationally recognized
expert on the relationship between law and
national security policy.
Our goal is to offer a balanced dialogue
on these issues, which is reflected in
the lineup of panel topics and participants.
These topics include the prosecution and
defense of terrorist suspects before civilian
and military courts, the relationship between
law and religion in the War on Terror, legal
challenges associated with civilian contractor
accountability, ethical issues associated
with detainee operations, and the impact
of U.S. policies on international credibility.
We have limited the event to two panels
and two presentations in order to ensure
a vibrant dialogue between panelists and
participants.
As the recent Supreme Court decision
in Boumediene v. Bush reminds us, the
resolution of legal issues related to the War on
Terror and the role of law in this war generate
tremendous emotion and controversy. Our
goal is to offer attendees for this symposium
the opportunity to develop an in-depth
appreciation of the challenge confronting the
legal profession in this process from a pool of
nationally recognized experts. |
|
|